Sourcing without Evidence, Playing with Public Opinion

The Associated Press news, citing two anonymous sources, claims that Trump intends to use the fabricated term "Arabian Gulf" ahead of his visit to Saudi Arabia. However, this report lacks any official documentation or government statement. Such reports resemble more of a tool for gauging reactions and testing the political climate than the announcement of a definitive policy. Experience has shown that the use of unnamed sources is a common method for creating buzz, spreading news, and exerting psychological pressure in the field of public diplomacy, especially when national and identity sensitivities are at stake.

Suspicious Timing with Regional Developments

This news emerged right in the middle of indirect negotiations between Iran and the United States, and coincided with new security movements in the region. It could be part of a multi-layered project: to provoke Iranian sentiments, divert attention from strategic issues, and garner further support from some Arab governments for the US This old tactic once again illustrates that Washington’s media policy is an inseparable part of its political and security pressure apparatus. By pumping uncertain news, public opinion is weakened, and negotiating positions are placed under pressure.

A Wise Response to Deliberate Distortion

In response to such news, a calm and strategic approach is required. The Persian Gulf is not merely a name but a clear document in the historical memory and global geography; from Greek, Islamic, and European documents to the official name used by the United Nations. Google Maps and Trump’s statements do not have the power to distort this truth. The appropriate response should focus on public diplomacy, media storytelling, and leveraging Iran’s legal and historical capacity on the international stage. Countering distortion requires media intelligence, not emotional anger.