Today’s resolution against Iran once again revealed that certain Western countries—particularly the European troika alongside the United States—have disguised a political decision under the veneer of legal and technical justification. Passed with 19 votes in favor, 11 abstentions, and only 3 votes against, this resolution is a continuation of the same project pursued by the Zionist regime after the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA). It aims to revive obsolete allegations under the banner of "Possible Military Dimensions" (PMD), with the ultimate goal of referring Iran’s case back to the UN Security Council.
This resolution not only fails to acknowledge Iran’s ongoing cooperation with the Agency but also bases its main claims on old and unfounded allegations sourced from documents purportedly provided by the Zionist regime. Even more troubling is the mention of a potential referral to the Security Council, suggesting that the intention is not to resolve the issue, but to escalate the crisis.
From Cooperation to Reciprocal Response: A Shift in Iran’s Approach
The joint response by Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran signals a tactical and strategic shift in the face of Western double standards. The statement clearly reaffirms Iran’s adherence to its safeguards commitments and highlights that none of the Agency’s reports indicate any deviation in Iran’s nuclear program.
Furthermore, the statement explicitly points out the contradiction between the resolution’s content and the IAEA Director General’s political report, as well as the attempt to reopen previously closed files—issues that had been resolved under the November 2015 agreement. This demonstrates Tehran’s clear understanding of the political game at play behind the scenes. The international community’s silence regarding the Zionist regime’s nuclear program, and its disregard for open military threats against Iran’s peaceful facilities, have further undermined the credibility of the IAEA.
A Technical Response with a Political Message: Launching a Third Enrichment Site
In response to this hostile move, the Islamic Republic of Iran has not taken a passive stance. Instead, it has announced the establishment of a new enrichment site in a secure location and the replacement of first-generation centrifuges with advanced sixth-generation machines—initiating a new phase of technical and strategic activities. These measures, formally communicated to the Agency by the head of the Atomic Energy Organization, are not only lawful and within the framework of the NPT, but also send a clear message to the Board of Governors and the countries behind the resolution: Iran’s only response to political pressure will be to strengthen its peaceful nuclear deterrence capabilities.
According to Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesperson for the Atomic Energy Organization or Iran, these actions will significantly increase Iran’s enrichment capacity. Moreover, the design of the third site—featuring a high level of security—demonstrates that Iran is redefining its technical equations in alignment with ongoing political developments.
A Window for Engagement or a Repetition of Failed Confrontation?
The most important takeaway from recent developments is that the Islamic Republic of Iran, relying on indigenous knowledge and domestic capabilities, is standing firm against worn-out political scenarios. In response to hostile actions, it prefers a precise, technically grounded course of action. What has transpired today could serve as a test for the remaining members of the IAEA: Is the IAEA truly a technical body, or merely a tool in the hands of political powers?
Past experiences—including periods of pressure and sanctions—have shown that pressure policies yield no outcome other than enhancing Iran’s peaceful nuclear capabilities. Along this path, the Islamic Republic not only retains the upper hand in diplomacy but also effectively reinforces the equation of deterrence.
NOURNEWS